skip to main content
US FlagAn official website of the United States government
dot gov icon
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
https lock icon
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( lock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Search for: All records

Creators/Authors contains: "Anneberg, Thomas_J"

Note: When clicking on a Digital Object Identifier (DOI) number, you will be taken to an external site maintained by the publisher. Some full text articles may not yet be available without a charge during the embargo (administrative interval).
What is a DOI Number?

Some links on this page may take you to non-federal websites. Their policies may differ from this site.

  1. PremisePolyploidy is known to cause physiological changes in plants which, in turn, can affect species interactions. One major physiological change predicted in polyploid plants is a heightened demand for growth‐limiting nutrients. Consequently, we expect polyploidy to cause an increased reliance on the belowground mutualists that supply these growth‐limiting nutrients. An important first step in investigating how polyploidy affects nutritional mutualisms in plants, then, is to characterize differences in the rate at which diploids and polyploids interact with belowground mutualists. MethodsWe usedHeuchera cylindrica(Saxifragaceae) to test how polyploidy influences interactions with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF). Here we first confirmed the presence ofAMFinH. cylindrica, and then we used field‐collected specimens to quantify and compare the presence ofAMFstructures while controlling for site‐specific variation. ResultsTetraploids had higher colonization rates as measured by total, hyphal, and nutritional‐exchange structures; however, we found that diploids and tetraploids did not differ in vesicle colonization rates. ConclusionsThe results suggest that polyploidy may alter belowground nutritional mutualisms with plants. Because colonization by nutritional‐exchange structures was higher in polyploids but vesicle colonization was not, polyploids might form stronger associations with theirAMFpartners. Controlled experiments are necessary to test whether this pattern is driven by the direct effect of polyploidy onAMFcolonization. 
    more » « less